tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7644796796806029769.post525316496743732162..comments2023-05-08T10:11:57.815-04:00Comments on The Wandering Quille: C is for CritiqueMaggie Maxwellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09323518786257452997noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7644796796806029769.post-65843071148120696322016-04-04T19:25:09.183-04:002016-04-04T19:25:09.183-04:00Nothing wrong with red tulips. Everyone has their ...Nothing wrong with red tulips. Everyone has their weak spots. It's going to take time to round out your skills, as such stuff always does. I mean, how long have I been trying just to string together a coherent scene?<br /><br />In the mean time, you realize that yes, you may only notice low level stuff, but you're exceedingly good at it? You always pick up on inconsistencies, certain types of plot holes, and many grammar/factual things Al across an entire story which would escape others because they forgot from one scene to the next, or it just doesn't bother them. Don't undervalue that - cleaning up the red tulips really does make the work more professional looking. If you want an actual example, let's just say there were certain things in Blank that only you noticed, like the naming inconsistencies, the impartiality of a syringe vs. paste, and the brutality of a certain fight scene. In general, such things are my weak points because I always leave consistency and brutal real world detail for last. Because of that feedback, I was able to take better care when I wrote that scene straight off, so the first draft came out SO much better for it. We writers NEED our red tulip weeder-outers!<br /><br />When you're ready/if you want, I'd be glad to cast an eye over TBOBD and work ZEE FENG SHUI. J. A. Ramahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14325753372228675047noreply@blogger.com